|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
General Campaign Presidential Debates What Do Debates Talk About (Content of Debates)? Functions. Studies on the nature of political messages often look at the frequency of three functions of candidate remarks:
Together, these kinds of statements can be used by voters like cost-benefit analysis. Acclaims can increase a candidate's benefits, attacks can increase a candidate's costs, and defenses can reduce alleged costs. In the general presidential debates (1960, 1976-2000) acclaims account for 55% of the statements made by candidates, attacks constitute 35% of their remarks, and defenses are 10% of their utterances. However, the relative proportion of acclaims and attacks has altered over time. In 1960, Nixon and Kennedy used the smallest proportion of acclaims (49%) and the largest amount of attacks (39%). In 2000, Bush and Gore used 74% acclaims and only 24% attacks. There is a statistically significant trend over time with acclaims becoming more common and attacks less common. Topics. Research also looks at the two topics of campaign messages: policy and character.
General presidential debates (1960, 1976-2000) focus more on policy (75%) than on the candidates' character (25%). Unlike functions, there has not been a trend toward more emphasis on one topic over time. |
Presidential Debates Background: How Many People Resources on
Television Spots Background:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
| Home | Primary Campaign | Nominating Conventions | General Campaign | News Coverage of Campaigns | 2008 Presidential Campaign | copyright © 2004 The Curators
of the University of Missouri This Web site is made possible through the support of Contact the Web editor: William Benoit |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||